www.RipOffReport.com

I could almost hear Lou Pearlman chortling — actually, I imagine it to be more like wheezing — as I read the July 21 Orlando Sentinel story “State clears Pearlman after modeling probe,” which noted that a two-year attorney general’s investigation into Big Lou’s model-scouting company — variously Wilhelmina Scouting Network, Options Talent, Trans Continental Talent and eModels, Inc.,

Pearlman’s had a good couple of months. First, it looks like the city is going to hand over the $3 million incentive package it promised more than a year ago for Church Street Station’s redevelopment, never mind Pearlman missing deadlines, not paying contractors, being late on property taxes and so on.

And now his official exoneration from the state of Florida.

Despite 2,000 complaints to state investigators alleging that the modeling company Pearlman owned from September 2002 to October 2003 was a scam, the state attorney general’s office decided the case wasn’t worth pursuing. (Recall that Pearlman publicly, and vehemently, distanced himself from the companies in question by suing dozens of Options Talent consultants and employees for $100 million, alleging they misled him during negotiations for Pearlman’s takeover. That got him a big headline in the Sentinel. What the paper didn’t report was that Pearlman dropped the suit in April.) www.ripoffreport.com

But Pearlman isn’t satisfied. Perhaps pissed off at the months of bad press, Pearlman’s newest offering, Fashion Rock, LLC, has gone on the offensive, inundating his critics with lawsuits. On June 4, Fashion Rock, which sells weekend conventions to wannabe actors and models for $1,500 a pop, filed a lawsuit against 200-plus named and unnamed detractors and 50 unnamed companies. He’s alleging defamation, invasion of privacy, misappropriation of trade secrets, civil conspiracy and racketeering.

But that’s not all. Four Fashion Rock employees sued William Rosenberger, who Fashion Rock claims in the suits was the operator of www.transconscam.com. Also named in the suits are Rosenberger’s mother and his dead father’s estate. And Fashion Rock has taken their jihad into cyberspace, launching www.transconblackmail.com and a dozen other websites that paint Rosenberger as a mentally unstable conspiracy nut, and other critics as charlatans on a vendetta who play loose with facts.

It’s Pearlman’s less-than-subtle way of saying, “Don’t mess with me.”

Is his threat empty? The defendants think so. “I haven’t been served,” says Frank Torelli, an investigative reporter for www.ripoffreport.com, who was named as a defendant. In fact, Torelli and other defendants say only one defendant, Les Henderson, has been served. Henderson says he had never even heard of Fashion Rock before the lawsuit, much less defamed it. “I haven’t changed my [web] page in two years,” he says. “I haven’t mentioned Fashion Rock.”

The lawsuits, essentially, boil down to three points: The defendants posted false information on various anti-Pearlman websites, which turned off potential customers; they fed negative stories to the media, who then reported it, turning off potential customers; they gave bad information to state officials, which prompted the state investigation, which was then reported by the media, and turned off potential customers.

Add comment October 12th, 2009

RipOffReport.com

Google Algorithm Update Needed To Remove Scam Sites


We posting this because of a recent issue we had with a company online that dominates Google’s natural listings for competitive search terms.

The company in question is ProjectorLampCenter.com and they rank very well for terms like “projector lamps”, “projector bulbs”, etc.. They are a known scam site and you can read all about our report and others at RipOffReport.com.

The question in hand is that natural search results have been and should always be trusted results, due to the fact that you actually have to work and genuinely cares about your site in order to rank. Any one can pay for rankings in PPC on Google or other search engines to rank well but we have sold our services on the basis of customers trusting natural listings over paid listings. Due to potential customers trusting natural listings over paid, there is a higher click ratio, thus more visitors.

Companies generally do not start off being great and then switch to a scam site, they usually have prior intentions. Maybe this is true maybe not. But when a company has been scamming people since 2006, why is Google still ranking this site well in it’s Search Engine Results Pages (SERP’s). If users can go to RipOffReport.com and find out if a company has a scamming report, why can’t googles bot do a quick check and see if they have a pre-determined amount of negative reports and decrease rankings accordingly. When a company resolves these issues Googles bot will recrawl and improve results.

I personally think this would be a great update into they’re algorithm and will reduce a lot of scam sites out there from continuing to make money. This could even be incorporated into the paid results, pretty sure they would never do that though. RipOffReport.com

Please visit : RipOffReport.com

Add comment October 12th, 2009

RipOffReport

Ripoffreport used to be my source of information. After I received a fake and libelous ripoffreport (I am not a business), I no longer trust the content on the website. I posted a legitimate complaint about the services provided by an individual. I used my real name (I was naive). The person continuously post lies about me on the site, uses my real name, posted my work address and so forth. The person admitted they were posting lies in retailiation for my complaint about their services.

I contacted Ripoffreport and received no assistance whatsoever. My only recourse is to sue the individual. If I sue the individual, there is no guarantee that he or she will stop. Ripoffreport knows from reading their posts that the posts are fake and yet they allow them.

I feel foolish now for being so trusting of the information on the site. I am now spending my time defending lies that ripoffreport.com knows are lies. I should never have trusted the site. I thought the site was legitimate. I had no idea it was not a legitimate site. Ripoffreport

Add comment October 12th, 2009


Categories

 

July 2010
M T W T F S S
« Oct    
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031